Portfolio due diligence
You sent us a lot of detailed questions after the launch call. We grouped them into eight subjects and answered each one properly, with the numbers behind them.
Based on the full-history backtest and observed portfolio exposures. Figures are rounded where appropriate.
Last day to subscribe: Friday 7 August 2026
Trading starts: Monday 10 August 2026
Sleeve risk and drawdown drivers
| Sleeve | Ann. volatility | Max drawdown | Worst year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity mean reversion | 4.6% | -6.8% | 2023: +0.6% |
| Short-term tactical | 3.9% | -8.7% | 2012: -4.3% |
| Equity momentum | 3.8% | -8.2% | 2012: -3.3% |
| Tactical allocation | 3.6% | -4.1% | 2015: -0.9% |
| Crisis hedging | 3.0% | -6.6% | 2014: -3.1% |
| Real-assets trend | 0.9% | -3.4% | 2008: -0.7% |
Annualized volatility and maximum drawdown by sleeve, full-history backtest.
The portfolio's maximum drawdown was 17.3% in 2008. The main contributors were short-term tactical (−7.7 percentage points), tactical allocation (−4.0), mean reversion (−2.9) and momentum (−2.6). Across the ten largest drawdowns, short-term tactical and tactical allocation were the most frequent drivers.
Contribution to the portfolio's largest drawdown (-17.3%, 2008), in percentage points.
Crisis hedging
The portfolio uses VXX and UVXY for long-volatility exposure, alongside systematic equity and ETF shorts. VIX indices are used as signals; the portfolio does not trade VIX futures or options.
In calm years, the median long-volatility cost was approximately 0.3% annually before client fees and 0.9% after allocated client fees. Results vary because the hedge is tactical rather than permanently held.
The worst historical whipsaw was an 11.1% portfolio-contribution loss between May 2012 and August 2015. It was not recovered until September 2020.
Staying ready when markets change
Crisis hedging is designed to help the portfolio remain stable when a normal market correction develops into a real crash or longer crisis. Its value is not only the direct protection. By limiting part of the damage, it helps the portfolio stay invested, preserve risk capacity and avoid defensive decisions near the worst point.
This can leave the portfolio in good shape to use the opportunities that larger market dislocations usually create. Mean reversion and other tactical strategies often find their best setups exactly when markets are under stress. The goal is to make the full portfolio more resilient on both sides of a crisis: protection during the decline, and opportunity during the recovery.
Volatility target and sleeve recalibration
The ETI does not run a fixed absolute volatility target. Realized annualized volatility over the full backtest was approximately 11.7%. Weights are determined through:
- Strategic allocations across close, overnight and intraday strategies
- Daily systematic signals
- Relative-volatility scaling
- Portfolio caps, priority rules and beta hedging
The six reporting sleeves are not periodically reoptimized. Their underlying allocations change daily with signals, while strategic budget changes are made through the research and portfolio-review process.
The ETI return series also includes its client fee structure, so its reported performance differs from an individual live account.
Observed gross, net and short exposure as a share of NAV, January 2018 to June 2026 — exposure varies with signals rather than tracking a fixed target.
Exposures
Configured and observed maximum individual-stock exposure was 20% long and approximately 7.5% short. Those are very rare numbers.
QQQ
+73.0%
-13.0%
Largest observed long / short
SPY
+48.4%
-32.0%
Largest observed long / short
TLT
+42.0%
-12.0%
Largest observed long / short
Maximum observed gross exposure by sleeve, as a share of NAV. These are historical maxima, not normal day-to-day allocations.
ETF and stock universe
Stocks are S&P 500 members, point in time.
The ETF set is dynamic rather than a fixed list of 20–25 instruments. The median day contained approximately 13 ETFs. The current economically active set includes:
Smaller or intermittent allocations may also appear in international, factor, commodity, bond and sector ETFs.
A fast shock out of a calm market
February 2018 provides a useful example.
February 2018, phase by phase: index, portfolio, and the crisis-hedge contribution.
Tactical allocation, momentum and real assets were hit first. During the main shock, short-term tactical was the largest loss contributor.
The volatility hedge reacted after the initial decline and reduced subsequent losses, but did not fully offset them. It then gave back part of the protection during the rebound. That sequence is the honest shape of this kind of insurance.
Digital assets
The portfolio uses IBIT for Bitcoin exposure and ETHE for Ether exposure. Maximum combined observed digital-asset exposure, which is also the actual combined limit, is approximately 10% — and again, that level is very rare.
Systematic versus discretionary
The portfolio is systematic in signal generation, sizing, portfolio construction and target weights. There is no active discretionary strategy override.
Operational intervention remains possible for risk management, execution or exceptional market circumstances, but it is separate from the investment model.
If you want to be in at launch
Subscribe by Friday 7 August. Trading begins Monday 10 August 2026. From that date our monthly reports switch to the live ETI track record.
- ISIN
- DE000AMC0DZ1
- WKN
- AMC0DZ
- IBKR symbol
- AMC0FG
- Exchange
- Börse Stuttgart
Figures are based on the full-history backtest and observed portfolio exposures, and are rounded where appropriate. Performance data prior to 2026 is based on backtested results and does not represent actual trading. Backtested performance is hypothetical and has inherent limitations. For informational purposes only. This is not investment advice or an offer to invest. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of capital. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full product documentation and risk disclosures are available on request.