2025 Annual Report

Throughout 2025, many prominent voices described the crypto market as being in a growth phase, yet the Top 50 crypto futures index fell 73% and Bitcoin posted a negative return. This report addresses what drove that disconnect and how we navigated it.

1. The Market by the Numbers

2025 Was a Bear Market

One of the most common mistakes in crypto analysis is evaluating the entire market based solely on Bitcoin. When you look at the broader picture, 2025 was unambiguously a bear market.

Our Top 50 Index, which tracks the fifty most liquid coins on Binance Futures (rebalanced daily), finished the year down approximately 73%.

Top50 equally weighted Binance futures, rebalanced daily. 1/1/2025 - 31/12/2025

Altcoin Performance Mirrored 2022

With hindsight, no one describes 2022 as a bull cycle. Yet when you compare the altcoin performance between 2022 and 2025, the patterns are remarkably similar.

Top50 equally weighted Binance futures, rebalanced daily. 1/1/2022 - 31/12/2022

Bitcoin's Relative Underperformance

Despite strong performance in traditional assets (the S&P 500 and gold both posted significant gains) Bitcoin ended 2025 with a loss of approximately 6%.

Year-to-date performance comparison. 1/1/2025 - 31/12/2025

2. A Tale of Two Volatility Regimes

From a volatility perspective, 2025 can be split into two distinct market regimes:

First Half (January–June)

Volatility was declining but remained elevated enough to create favorable conditions for our portfolios. This period still featured good momentum, sufficient volatility, and short-term trends we could capture. Our short-term momentum strategies perform well in this environment, which is why we were able to profit from the brief but tradeable moves that occurred. Long-term momentum approaches, by contrast, generally struggled during this period.

60-Day Rolling Volatility 2025 H1

60-Day Rolling Annualized Volatility (%)

Second Half (July–December)

This is where our drawdown developed. August and September 2025 saw the lowest volatility of the year, which is a challenging environment for directional trading. Then came October 10th, the largest liquidation event of the year. For our models, which have an average holding time of 1.8 days, these extremely short-term volatility spikes are primarily about risk management. Preserving capital matters more than maximizing gains. We navigated that day well, finishing in positive territory. The remainder of the year saw volatility continue its decline, reaching particularly low levels by December.

60-Day Rolling Volatility 2025 H1

60-Day Rolling Annualized Volatility (%)

For additional clarity, below is a chart with the October 10–20 period removed. This shows the underlying market state and reduced volatility regime without the distortion of that brief but extreme liquidation event.

60-Day Rolling Volatility 2025 H1

60-Day Rolling Annualized Volatility (%)

3. New Listings and Post-Launch Price Dynamics

Binance listed a significant number of new tokens in 2025, often with high daily volume at launch. The pattern consistently showed high initial volume, followed by steady persistent decline.

Median Performance of Binance Futures Symbols Listed in 2025

25th-75th Percentile Median Performance

4. The Robuxio Trading Approach

Broad Strategy Diversification

We trade over 20 strategies spanning both momentum and mean reversion approaches. Each strategy can hold up to 20 positions, and each position can be spread across up to 5 sub-positions through parameter offsetting. Sub-positions can be further distributed using various weighted average price techniques. This eliminates strategy selection bias, ensuring we're not betting on one approach being right.

Broad Tradable Universe

Our trading engine ranks the entire crypto futures market daily based on liquidity metrics, selecting the top 40–50 coins that meet our criteria. This process eliminates coin selection bias.

No Directional Bias

The crypto market has a well-documented short-term bias toward the long side, with long strategies carrying a more statistically significant edge. But shorts are tradeable too. As part of our all-weather approach, we trade both directions.

Mid-Frequency with Robustness First

We know that edge decay in crypto happens faster than in any other market. Our protection against this is building models that are mid-to-low frequency with high original expectancy. Research consistently shows these models decay more slowly, particularly when based on simple, transferable edges that work across asset classes. The single most important criterion for a model to enter our portfolio is a minimum exptectancy of 1%, preferably 1.5% or higher.

Advantages of this approach

Our trading approach has the following advantages:

Disadvantages of this approach

As always in trading, there is no free lunch. We pay for the advantages above with following disadvantages:

A Note on Outliers

Our exposure to smaller, more volatile coins cuts both ways. These coins can move 100%+ in a single day during high volatility periods, which is one reason we perform well when volatility spikes. Negative outliers are also part of the equation. We manage this through position constraints and advanced volatility targeting, which automatically reduces allocation to highly volatile, lower quality coins. More on that later.

5. Performance Since Launch

Our High Sharpe portfolios launched for select clients in July 2024. Here's the out-of-sample performance since then:

HSLV and HSHV portfolio performance vs Top50 Index and Bitcoin. July 2024 onwards.

Note: For simplicity all the performance metrics in this report are based on our USDT collateralized portfolio offerings run on Binance. Variance from the displayed performance can arise due to differences in exchanges (different tradable universes), collateral (BTC, ETH ot USDT), VIP tier (trading fees will differ, and trading account type (PM Mode or Futures Classic Mode).

Understanding When Directional Portfolios Perform

Over large datasets, we can identify which market environments favor or challenge directional strategies. Ranked from most favorable to least.

Directional market + rising volatility

2025 examples: February decline, May rally

Directional market + stable or moderately declining volatility

2025 example: July growth

Non-directional market + rising volatility

Did not occur in any meaningful duration during 2025

Non-directional market + declining volatility

2025 example: August–September

Performance 2025

HSLV and HSHV portfolio performance vs Top50 Index and Bitcoin. 1/1/2025 - 31/12/2025

First half (January-July)

Our portfolios captured the higher volatility and short-term trends effectively. At peak, our HSHV portfolio outperformed both Bitcoin and the broader market. Given the challenging conditions for passive crypto holders (the Top 50 finished down 73%), this period represented strong risk-adjusted performance.

Second half (August-December)

This period brought an above-average drawdown, driven by two overlapping factors: the unfavorable market regime and a cluster of negative outliers. Let me explain each.

The Drawdown Cause

Market Regime

August and September had the lowest volatility of 2025. The market moved sideways. Statistically, this is precisely the environment where our approach builds drawdowns. This is the expected behavior of our approach during such conditions.

Drawdown Analysis

60-Day Rolling Annualized Volatility (%). 1/1/2025 - 31/12/2025

Negative Outliers

The natural drawdown from market conditions was amplified by an unusual clustering of negative outliers.

As noted earlier, we intentionally maintain exposure to highly volatile smaller coins because, over time, this pays off substantially. Negative outliers are always part of trading smaller coins, which is why we have to both expect and plan for them.

What changed in 2025: Binance began onboarding more projects that were essentially vehicles for exit liquidity. These coins passed our liquidity filters because they launched with high volume, often driven by initial listing activity rather than sustained interest. They entered our tradable universe more frequently than in previous years.

Percentage of trades with losses exceeding 25%. 2020 - 2025

Compared to 2022, the other major altcoin bear market in recent memory, our negative outlier rate was 2.4x higher in 2025. A significant number of these outliers clustered in August and September, deepening the drawdown beyond historical norms.

Context on Negative Outliers

These outliers occur almost exclusively in the smallest coins in our tradable universe. These coins already receive the smallest allocations due to our volatility and quality-based sizing. A 25% negative outlier on such a coin translates to roughly 0.5%–0.8% portfolio loss for our high volatility portfolio, and half that for the low-volatility version.

Statistically, negative outliers cluster in high volatility periods, which are the same periods where we also capture positive outliers of 50%+. The asymmetry typically works in our favor. August–September was unusual in that we experienced the negative outliers without the offsetting positive ones.

The Adjustments

We identified the statistical shift in our data at the start of September and immediately began research. Our goal was to reduce exposure to coins prone to manipulation while preserving exposure to smaller coins with legitimate explosive upside potential. We spent September and October on this research. On November 6th, we deployed the updated portfolio. Below are the adjustments we made.

1. Refined Tradable Universe

The primary change targeted our coin selection. We still trade the top 40–50 coins ranked daily by liquidity parameters. But, we added new metrics focused on coin quality and price manipulation potential.

The coins causing issues shared a common characteristic: susceptibility to price manipulation. Our new filtering mechanism identifies and excludes these coins while maintaining the overall character of our tradable universe.

Universe Comparison

Cumulative returns comparing old and new tradable universe. 2020 - 2025

2. Reduced Negative Outlier Rate

The stricter quality filtering directly reduced negative outliers while maintaining exposure to positive outliers.

Outlier Reduction

Percentage of trades with losses exceeding 25%, old vs new universe. 2020 - 2025

For additional clarity, here's the 30-day rolling outlier rate comparing old and new universe. The cluster in August–September 2025 is visible in the data. The spike following October 10th did not cause portfolio-level problems. That was a high volatility period where negative outliers on long trades were more than offset by gains on short trades. The portfolio executed several hundred trades during that period.

Outlier Reduction

30-day rolling outlier rate, old vs new universe. 2020 - 2025

3. Faster Exit from Negative Outliers

Outliers will always be part of our trading. We developed better mechanisms to reduce their impact through quicker exits in highly volatile edge cases.

4. New Hedging Mechanisms

Our ongoing research always explores low correlation models. In the second half of 2025, we specifically prioritized models with strong hedging characteristics to reduce exposure to various left-tail scenarios.

5. Improved Short-Side Exits

As the crypto market matures, it increasingly shows mean reversion characteristics on the long side, where sharp declines are quickly bought. This pattern is familiar from equity markets. We responded by implementing more aggressive exits from short positions during sharp market corrections. This single change meaningfully improved return stability. Shorting remains essential to our all-weather approach, and our quantitative research in this area continues.

Results Since November 6th

Our goal was to stay exposed to as many small, liquid cryptocurrencies as possible, as these remain the least efficient and offer the highest long-term expectancy, while better managing the associated risks.

Old and New HSHV portfolio performance since November 6th.

The outlier reduction proved particularly effective. After November 6th, the old (no longer traded) universe continued showing elevated negative outlier rates while our current universe showed a significant reduction.

Outlier Reduction

30-day rolling outlier rate, old vs new universe. January 2024 - December 2025

A Note on Volatility

We frequently receive questions about volatility and its impact on our returns. This is a reasonable question, as short-term directional trading is partially correlated with volatility.

Here's the full historical volatility of our Top50 equally weighted index:

Outlier Reduction

60-Day Rolling Annualized Volatility (%), Top50 Index. 2020 - 2025

The key insight is that while Bitcoin's volatility has declined substantially, the volatility profile of the broader crypto universe has remained essentially unchanged since mid-2022.

Smaller coins remain below the radar of the largest institutional players. This is precisely why we pursue the challenging discipline of diversified portfolio trading across dozens of cryptocurrencies. The potential returns in this universe still significantly exceed what's possible with capital in the hundreds of millions.

The only certain thing in markets is that high volatility periods are followed by low volatility periods, and vice versa. This pattern is as old as financial markets themselves.

Summing Up 2025

In absolute terms, we outperformed both the broad market and Bitcoin.

We had a strong first half of the year. August and September brought not just a drawdown but new insights into changing market dynamics. These insights were then implemented promptly.

The portfolio udpates have reduced downside volatility while maintaining our exposure to the broad cryptocurrency market through a highly diversified portfolio of directional strategies.

To your continued success,

The Robuxio Team

Team Robuxio